4.8 Article

Regio- and Enantioselective (3+3) Cycloaddition of Nitrones with 2-Indolylmethanols Enabled by Cooperative Organocatalysis

Journal

ANGEWANDTE CHEMIE-INTERNATIONAL EDITION
Volume 60, Issue 5, Pages 2355-2363

Publisher

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/anie.202011267

Keywords

cooperative catalysis; cycloaddition; enantioselectivity; indolylmethanol; nitrone; organocatalysis

Funding

  1. NSFC [21772069, 21831007]
  2. Natural Science Foundation of Jiangsu Province [BK20201018]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The regio- and enantioselective (3+3) cycloaddition of nitrones with 2-indolylmethanols was successfully achieved through the cooperative catalysis of hexafluoroisopropanol (HFIP) and chiral phosphoric acid (CPA). This approach resulted in the synthesis of indole-fused six-membered heterocycles with high yields, excellent enantioselectivities, and exclusive regiospecificity. The role of the cocatalyst HFIP in helping CPA control the reactivity and enantioselectivity of the reaction was elucidated through theoretical calculations, demonstrating a new mode of cooperative catalysis.
The regio- and enantioselective (3+3) cycloaddition of nitrones with 2-indolylmethanols was accomplished by the cooperative catalysis of hexafluoroisopropanol (HFIP) and chiral phosphoric acid (CPA). Using this approach, a series of indole-fused six-membered heterocycles were synthesized in high yields (up to 98 %), with excellent enantioselectivities (up to 96 % ee) and exclusive regiospecificity. This approach enabled not only the first organocatalytic asymmetric (3+3) cycloaddition of nitrones but also the first C3-nucleophilic asymmetric (3+3) cycloaddition of 2-indolylmethanols. More importantly, theoretical calculations elucidated the role of the cocatalyst HFIP in helping CPA control the reactivity and enantioselectivity of the reaction, demonstrating a new mode of cooperative catalysis.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available