4.5 Article

Primary Prophylaxis to Prevent Tuberculosis Infection in Prison Inmates: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Trial

Journal

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF TROPICAL MEDICINE AND HYGIENE
Volume 103, Issue 4, Pages 1466-1472

Publisher

AMER SOC TROP MED & HYGIENE
DOI: 10.4269/ajtmh.20-0110

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Council for Scientific and Technological Development [420672/20176, 401824/2016-0]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In many low- and middle-income countries, tuberculosis (TB) incidence in prisons is high, exposing incarcerated populations to an elevated risk of TB infection. We conducted a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial among HIV-negative male inmates of a high TB burden prison to determine whether isoniazid given twice weekly (900 mg) for 12 months prevents TB infection. The primary outcome was QuantiFERON-TB Gold in Plus (QFT) conversion to >= 0.35 international units per milliliter (IU/mL) at 6 months; secondary outcomes included alternative QFT thresholds (>= 0.7, >= 2.0, and >= 4.0 IU/mL). In total, 467 participants were randomly assigned to intervention (N = 258) or control (N = 209). In an interim analysis of participants who had completed 6 months of follow-up (N = 170), QFT conversion occurred in 20.8% (19/91) and 21.5% (17/79) of participants in intervention and control arms (efficacy: 2.9%, P = 0.91), respectively. The trial was then stopped according to the trial protocol, and the remaining participants prematurely discontinued. In an analysis of secondary outcomes, the intervention arm had significantly lower rates of conversion at a cutoff of >= 2.0 IU/mL (efficacy: 82.6%, P < 0.01). In conclusion, 900 mg of isoniazid, administered twice a week, did not effectively prevent QFT conversion at a cutoff point >= 0.35 IU/mL in a trial of QFT-negative inmates. Higher QFT cutoffs are associated with sustained conversion and greater protection. Future clinical trials that evaluate protection for latent infection should use the highest cutoff than that recommended by the manufacturer.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available