4.6 Article

Subclinical biliary strictures as a cause of long-term allograft dysfunction in children who underwent liver transplantation

Journal

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF TRANSPLANTATION
Volume 21, Issue 1, Pages 391-399

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/ajt.16270

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study found that cholangiolar proliferation detected by cytokeratin-7 immunostain is a good predictor for subclinical biliary strictures, and alkaline phosphatase levels exceeding 325 IU/L may indicate the presence of BS. Furthermore, it was suggested that BS could be a main contributor to long-term allograft dysfunction in this population.
We aimed to evaluate the role of liver biopsy to predict subclinical biliary strictures (BS) and assess the impact of BS on long-term allograft dysfunction following liver transplantation in children (LT). We reviewed all liver biopsies performed from 2012-2018. Percutaneous transhepatic cholangiography (PTC) was performed in patients presenting cholangiolar proliferation on cytokeratin-7 stained sections. We performed 271 biopsies in 161 children (86% with a left lateral segment); 44/161 (27%) presented with diffuse or multifocal cholangiolar proliferation. Among them, a tight BS was confirmed in 38/44 (86%, 24% of total) and it was managed by balloon dilatation. Cholangiolar proliferation showed a positive predictive value (PPV) for BS of 86.4%. Levels of alkaline phosphatase >325 IU/L predicted BS (P = .007). Dilatation of intrahepatic bile ducts on ultrasound was found only in 44% of patients with BS. Following a median follow-up of 9.2 years, only 15/38 (39%) patients resolved the BS. In conclusion subclinical BS is very common and probably underdiagnosed in these patients. Histological evidence of cholangiolar proliferation detectable by cytokeratin-7 immunostain should be preferred to liver function tests and ultrasound to suspect BS. BS in this setting should be regarded as a main cause of long-term allograft dysfunction.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available