4.4 Article

High value care education in general surgery residency programs: A multi-institutional needs assessment

Journal

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY
Volume 221, Issue 2, Pages 291-297

Publisher

EXCERPTA MEDICA INC-ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2020.09.032

Keywords

general surgery; Internship and residency; Quality improvement; Patient safety; Cost control; Education; Medical; Graduate

Categories

Funding

  1. National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences of the National Institutes of Health [UL1TR002538]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study found that few general surgery residents feel that high value care is very important for their future practice, and only a small percentage of residents believe they have the ability to lead quality improvement initiatives. In addition, a minority of residents have participated in root cause analysis, and exposure to cost considerations is limited.
Background: The ACGME mandates that residency programs provide training related to high value care (HVC). The purpose of this study was to explore HVC education in general surgery residency programs. Methods: An electronic survey was distributed to general surgery residents in geographically diverse programs. Results: The response rate was 29% (181/619). Residents reported various HVC components in their curricula. Less than half felt HVC is very important for their future practice (44%) and only 15% felt confident they could lead a QI initiative in practice. Only 20% of residents reported participating in a root cause analysis and less than one-third of residents (30%) were frequently exposed to cost considerations. Conclusion: Few residents feel prepared to lead quality improvement initiatives, have participated in patient safety processes, or are aware of patients' costs of care. This underscores the need for improved scope and quality of HVC education and establishment of formal curricula. (C) 2020 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available