4.2 Review

Management and Nutrition of Neonates during the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Review of the Existing Guidelines and Recommendations

Journal

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PERINATOLOGY
Volume 37, Issue -, Pages S46-S53

Publisher

THIEME MEDICAL PUBL INC
DOI: 10.1055/s-0040-1714675

Keywords

SARS-CoV-2; COVID-19; neonatal management; postnatal nutrition; guidelines; AGREE II

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objective We aimed at reviewing the currently available guidelines and scientific recommendations regarding the neonatal in-hospital management and feeding in the light of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. Study Design We systematically searched the guideline databases, Medline, Embase, and nationale/international neonatal societies websites as of June 19, 2020, for guidelines on neonatal management and feeding during the COVID-19 pandemic, at the same time assessing the methodological quality using the Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation II tool. Results Eleven guidelines were included. The Chinese and American recommendations suggest separation of the mother and her neonate, whereas in French, Italian, UK, Canadian, and World Health Organization consensus documents the rooming-in is suggested, with Centers for Disease Control and Prevention guidelines suggesting to decide on a case-by-case basis. All the guidelines recommend breastfeeding or feeding with expressed maternal milk; the only exception is the Chinese recommendations, these last suggesting to avoid breastfeeding. Conclusion This review may provide a useful tool for clinicians and organizers, highlighting differences and similarities of the existing guidelines on the management and feeding strategies in the light of the COVID-19 pandemic. Key Points This study compares guidelines on management and nutrition of a newborn born to a mother with SARS-CoV-2 infection. Existing guidelines on neonatal management and nutrition during the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic show many differences. The majority of recommendations are mainly based on experts' opinion and are not evidence-based.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available