4.5 Article

Effect of the Abdominal Aortic and Junctional Tourniquet on chest compressions in a swine model of ventricular fibrillation

Journal

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE
Volume 45, Issue -, Pages 297-302

Publisher

W B SAUNDERS CO-ELSEVIER INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.ajem.2020.08.075

Keywords

Cardiopulmonary resuscitation; CPR; Ventricular fibrillation; Abdominal aortic and Junctional tourniquet; Cardiac arrest

Funding

  1. USAF Surgeon General's Intramural Clinical Investigations Program

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study found that although using AAJT during chest compressions did not increase the rate of ROSC, improvements in hemodynamic parameters were observed while the AAJT was in place.
Introduction: Mortality for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest is high when traditional chest compressions are used without adjuncts. The abdominal aortic and junctional tourniquet (AAJT) is a device with a wedge-shaped air bladder that occludes the aortic bifurcation, augmenting blood flow to the heart and brain. Previously, the addition of AAJT during chest compression led to an increase in rate of survival in a model of traumatic cardiac arrest. Hypothesis: This study was designed to determine if application of the AAJT would lead to more effective chest compressions as measured by improved hemodynamic parameters and an increased rate of return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC). Methods: Yorkshire swine (n = 6 per group) underwent general anesthesia and instrumentation. Ventricular fibrillation (Vfib) was electrically induced and animals were allocated into groups with or without the AAJT. The AAJT was inflated if selected after four minutes of compressions. Following a total of ten minutes of compressions, the animals entered into a ten-minute advanced cardiac life support phase. Hemodynamics and blood gas measurements were compared between groups. Results: ROSC or cardioversion from Vfib was not achieved in either group. The AAJT group had improved hemodynamic parameters with significantly higher carotid diastolic pressure and higher blood flow in the carotid artery (p = 0.016 and 0.028 respectively). However, no significant differences were observed with coronary perfusion pressure or end tidal CO2. Conclusion: The AAJT did not confer a survival advantage during chest compressions, but hemodynamic improvements were observed while the AAJT was in place. (C) 2020 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available