4.6 Article

Comprehensive analysis of TGF-β-induced mRNAs and ncRNAs in hepatocellular carcinoma

Journal

AGING-US
Volume 12, Issue 19, Pages 19399-19420

Publisher

IMPACT JOURNALS LLC
DOI: 10.18632/aging.103826

Keywords

transforming growth factor beta; epithelial-mesenchymal transition; hepatocellular carcinoma; competing endogenous RNAs

Funding

  1. State Key Project on Infectious Diseases of China [2018ZX10723204-003]
  2. National Nature Science Foundation of China [81874065, 81500565, 81874149, 81572427, 81401997]
  3. Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Malignant Tumor Investigation Fund of Chen Xiao-ping Foundation for the Development of Science and Technology of Hubei Province [CXPJJH118000012018356]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Transforming growth factor beta (TGF-beta) is a potent inducer of epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT) in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), and plays a critical role in its tumorigenesis and progression. Accumulating evidence indicates that protein-coding mRNAs, as well as non-coding RNAs (ncRNAs), may play key roles in the tumorigenesis and progression of HCC. In this study, we first report on the differential expression of lncRNAs, mRNAs, miRNAs, and circRNAs in Huh7 cells treated with TGF-beta or DMSO for 7 days. Gene ontology (GO) and Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) pathway analyses were performed for significantly differentially expressed RNAs (DE RNAs). Then the competing endogenous RNA (ceRNA) network based on these DE RNAs was predicted and constructed. Among them, we identified that lncRNA SLC7A11-AS1 and hsa_circ_0006123 are involved in the EMT process induced by TGF-beta and may promotes the metastasis of HCC. This knowledge may pave the way to develop novel clinical diagnostics and therapeutic approaches. Our study might open a new avenue for future investigations of the molecular mechanisms driving the EMT process induced by TGF-beta in HCC.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available