4.8 Article

Bloch Lines Constituting Antiskyrmions Captured via Differential Phase Contrast

Journal

ADVANCED MATERIALS
Volume 32, Issue 46, Pages -

Publisher

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/adma.202004206

Keywords

antiskyrmions; Bloch lines; differential phase contrast scanning transmission electron microscopy; Heusler compounds; spintronics

Funding

  1. JSPS [19H00660, 18H03685, 20H00349]
  2. CREST program from Japan Science and Technology Agency (JST) [JPMJCR1874, JPMJPR18L5]
  3. PRESTO program from Japan Science and Technology Agency (JST) [JPMJPR18L5]
  4. Asahi Glass Foundation
  5. Murata Science Foundation
  6. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [19H00660, 20H00349, 18H03685] Funding Source: KAKEN

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Much scientific capital has been directed toward exotic magnetic spin textures called Bloch lines, that is, Neel-type line boundaries within domain walls, because their geometry promises high-density magnetic storage. While predicted to arise in high-anisotropy magnets, bulk soft magnets, and thin films with in-plane magnetization, Bloch lines also constitute magnetic antiskyrmions, that is, topological antiparticles of skyrmions. Most domain walls occur as Bloch-type or Neel-type, in which the magnetization rotates parallel or perpendicular to the domain wall across its profile, respectively. The Bloch lines' Neel-type rotation and their minute size make them difficult to directly measure. This work utilizes differential phase contrast (DPC) scanning transmission electron microscopy (STEM) to measure the in-plane magnetization of Bloch lines within antiskyrmions emergent in a non-centrosymmetric Heusler magnet withD(2d)symmetry, Mn1.4Pt0.9Pd0.1Sn, in addition to Bloch-type skyrmions in an FeGe magnet with B20-type crystal structure to benchmark the DPC technique. Both in-focus measurement and identification of Bloch lines at the antiskyrmion's corners are provided.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available