4.5 Review

The first eight months of Sweden's COVID-19 strategy and the key actions and actors that were involved

Journal

ACTA PAEDIATRICA
Volume 109, Issue 12, Pages 2459-2471

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/apa.15582

Keywords

coronavirus; COVID-19; pandemic; social distancing; transmission

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Aim COVID-19 has affected millions of people worldwide. This paper reviews the Swedish pandemic response. Methods A narrative review was carried out and a timeline constructed. Results By September 1, 2020, 0.8% of Swedish residents had tested positive for the virus and 0.06% of the population had died, which was higher than neighbouring Nordic countries, but lower than some European countries with general lockdowns. The main actors were the Public Health Agency, the National Board of Health and Welfare, the Civil Contingencies Agency and the Government. County councils and regions implemented policies, in conjunction with the Department of Education and county administrative boards. Sweden's response was less invasive than many other countries, with no general lockdown. It focused on mitigation: slowing, but not stopping, the pandemic. Physical distancing was recommended in public spaces, but mandatory in bars, restaurants and at events. Visits to nursing facilities were banned. Kindergartens and schools for children up to 16 stayed open, but closed for older children for three months. There were no enforced quarantines for infected households or geographical regions, and facemasks were not recommended outside health care. Conclusion Sweden chose a different pandemic strategy to its peer nations. This paper examines the first eight months.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available