Journal
COMPLEMENTARY THERAPIES IN MEDICINE
Volume 24, Issue -, Pages 81-89Publisher
CHURCHILL LIVINGSTONE
DOI: 10.1016/j.ctim.2015.12.008
Keywords
Non-small cell lung cancer; Maintenance therapy; Chinese herbal medicine; Treatment according to syndrome differentiation; Quality of life; Progression-free survival
Categories
Funding
- Capital Citizen Health Cultivation Project of Beijing Scientific and Technological Program [Z111107067311044]
- National Natural Science Foundation of China [81473643]
- Capital Characteristic Clinical Application Research [Z131107002213037]
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Objective: The purpose of the study was to assess the efficacy and safety of using Chinese herbal medicine (CHM) as maintenance therapy considering the survival of advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients after first-line conventional platinum-based chemotherapy. Design: An open-label, randomized, controlled trial. Setting: Four hospitals in China. Interventions and main outcome measures: A total of 106 patients were eligible and randomly divided into two groups from four hospitals in China. Both groups received the best supporting care (BSC). Additionally, patients in the trial group were given CHM every day until the disease became aggravated or the patients resigned. The study took both progression-free survival (PFS) and quality of life (QOL) as the primary outcomes to comprehensively evaluate the effect of the treatment. QOL was measured by the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Lung (FACT-L) 4.0 questionnaire. Side effects and safety were evaluated at the same time. Results: Of the 106 patients, 99 completed the study. After treatment and follow-up for PFS, there were no significant differences. in the median PFS time and the 6-month PFS probability between the two groups. However, the 3-month PFS probability in the trial group was significantly higher than that in the control group (FAS, PPS: P< 0.01). For QOL, there were significant differences between the two groups in the following: physical well-being, emotional well-being, functional well-being, lung cancer symptom domain and total score of the FACT-L4.0 (FAS, PPS: P< 0.05). There was no significant difference in the social well-being domain. No serious adverse side effects to the treatment were observed. Conclusions: CHM is well tolerated and may improve the QOL of advanced NSCLC patients. CHM is worth studying in future investigations. (C) 2015 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an open access article under the CC-BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.orgilicensesiby-nc-nd/4.0/).
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available