4.8 Article

Nanoscale Friction Behavior of Transition-Metal Dichalcogenides: Role of the Chalcogenide

Journal

ACS NANO
Volume 14, Issue 11, Pages 16013-16021

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acsnano.0c07558

Keywords

nanoscale friction; atomic force microscope; molecular dynamics; molybdenum disulfide; molybdenum diselenide; molybdenum ditelluride

Funding

  1. National Science Foundation [CMMI-1762384, CMMI-1761874, ACI-1548562, NNCI-1542153]
  2. NSF MRSEC [DMR-1720530]
  3. NJIT Start-Up Funds

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Despite extensive research on the tribological properties of MoS2, the frictional characteristics of other members of the transition-metal dichalcogenide (TMD) family have remained relatively unexplored. To understand the effect of the chalcogen on the tribological behavior of these materials and gain broader general insights into the factors controlling friction at the nanoscale, we compared the friction force behavior for a nanoscale single asperity sliding on MoS2, MoSe2, and MoTe2 in both bulk and monolayer forms through a combination of atomic force microscopy experiments and molecular dynamics simulations. Experiments and simulations showed that, under otherwise identical conditions, MoS2 has the highest friction among these materials and MoTe2 has the lowest. Simulations complemented by theoretical analysis based on the Prandtl-Tomlinson model revealed that the observed friction contrast between the TMDs was attributable to their lattice constants, which differed depending on the chalcogen. While the corrugation amplitudes of the energy landscapes are similar for all three materials, larger lattice constants permit the tip to slide more easily across correspondingly wider saddle points in the potential energy landscape. These results emphasize the critical role of the lattice constant, which can be the determining factor for frictional behavior at the nanoscale.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available