4.6 Article

Generation and Characterization of Anti-Glucosepane Antibodies Enabling Direct Detection of Glucosepane in Retinal Tissue

Journal

ACS CHEMICAL BIOLOGY
Volume 15, Issue 10, Pages 2655-2661

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acschembio.0c00093

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. American Diabetes Association Pathway to Stop Diabetes Grant [1-17- VSN-04]
  2. SENS Research Foundation
  3. National Institute of Health Yale Chemical Biology Training Grant [2T32GM06754 3-17]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Although there is ample evidence that the advanced glycation end-product (AGE) glucosepane contributes to age-related morbidities and diabetic complications, the impact of glucosepane modifications on proteins has not been extensively explored due to the lack of sufficient analytical tools. Here, we report the development of the first polyclonal anti-glucosepane antibodies using a synthetic immunogen that contains the core bicydic ring structure of glucosepane. We investigate the recognition properties of these antibodies through ELISAs involving an array of synthetic AGE derivatives and determine them to be both high-affinity and selective in binding glucosepane. We then employ these antibodies to image glucosepane in aging mouse retinae via immunohistochemistry. Our studies demonstrate for the first time accumulation of glucosepane within the retinal pigment epithelium, Brach's membrane, and choroid: all regions of the eye impacted by age-related macular degeneration. Co-localization studies further su est that glucosepane colocalizes with lipofuscin, which has previously been associated with lysosomal dysfunction and has been implicated in the development of age-related macular degeneration, among other diseases. We believe that the anti-glucosepane antibodies described in this study will prove highly useful for examining the role of glycation in human health and disease.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available