4.8 Article

Novel Method for Preparing a High-Performance Auxetic Foam Directly from Polymer Resin by a One-Pot CO2 Foaming Process

Journal

ACS APPLIED MATERIALS & INTERFACES
Volume 12, Issue 42, Pages 48040-48048

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acsami.0c15383

Keywords

auxetic materials; CO2 foaming process; negative Poisson's ratio; phase transition; polymer foams; tensile cycle stability

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51573179, 51233005, 21304089]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

So far, negative Poisson's ratio foam (auxetic foam) is usually prepared by the transformation of conventional polymer foam, and it is a challenge to prepare auxetic foam directly from polymer resin. In this work, a novel method based on the synergism between the phase transition of water and the permeability rate difference of the CO2 blowing agent from air in the foaming process is put forward to prepare auxetic foam directly from the polymer resin. Using this method, herein, nylon elastomer (NE) foam with auxetic behavior is successfully prepared from NE resin by a one-pot CO2 foaming method inside an autoclave aided by water; the obtained auxetic foam has a Poisson's ratio value of -1.29 and has excellent tensile cycle stability and energy absorption performance. This method breaks through the bottleneck for preparing auxetic foams from the polymer resin directly, which is also green and environment-friendly. It is believed that the abovementioned method also applies to other thermoplastic polymers, which paves a way for designing and preparing multifunctional auxetic foam materials in the future via a one-pot CO2 foaming process. Furthermore, this work first demonstrates that the transformation between auxetic foam and positive Poisson's ratio foam is reversible due to the closed cell structure, which provides an opportunity to reversibly adjust the performance and the shape of polymer foam materials.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available