4.8 Article

Electrodeposited Zinc-Based Films as Anodes for Aqueous Zinc Batteries

Journal

ACS APPLIED MATERIALS & INTERFACES
Volume 12, Issue 38, Pages 42763-42772

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acsami.0c10956

Keywords

electrodeposition; zinc anode; alloy anode; zinc battery; aqueous battery

Funding

  1. U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office of Electricity [70247A]
  2. DOE [DE-AC05-76RL01830]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Zinc-based batteries have attracted extensive attention in recent years, due to high safety, high capacities, environmental friendliness, and low cost compared to lithium-ion batteries. However, the zinc anode suffers primarily from dendrite formation as a mode of failure in the mildly acidic system. Herein, we report on electrochemically deposited zinc (ED Zn) and copper-zinc (brass) alloy anodes, which are critically compared with a standard commercial zinc foil. The film electrodes are of commercially relevant thicknesses (21 and 25 mu M). The electrodeposited zinc-based anodes exhibit low electrode polarization (similar to 0.025 V) and stable cycling performance in 50 cycle consecutive experiments from 0.26 to 10 mA cm(-2) compared to commercial Zn foil. Coulombic efficiencies at 1 mA cm(-2) were over 98% for the electrodeposited zinc-based materials and were maintained for over 100 cycles. Furthermore, full cells with an electrodeposited Zn/brass anode, electrolytic manganese dioxide (EMD) cathode, in 1 M ZnSO4 + 0.1 M MnSO4 delivered capacities of 96.3 and 163 mAh g(-1), respectively, at 100 mA g(-1) compared to 92.1 mAh g(-1) for commercial Zn. The electrodeposited zinc-based anodes also show better rate capability, delivering full cell capacities of 35.9 and 47.5 mAh g(-1) at a high current of up to 3 A g(-1). Lastly, the electrodeposited zinc-based anodes show enhanced capacity for up to 100 cycles at 100 mA g(-1), making them viable anodes for commercial use.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available