4.7 Article

Validation of an Automated Body Condition Scoring System Using 3D Imaging

Journal

AGRICULTURE-BASEL
Volume 10, Issue 6, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/agriculture10060246

Keywords

Body condition score; cows; automated; validation; precision technology

Categories

Funding

  1. Science Foundation Ireland [13/IA/1977]
  2. Department of Agriculture, Food and Marine on behalf of the Government of Ireland [16/RC/3835]
  3. Science Foundation Ireland (SFI) [13/IA/1977] Funding Source: Science Foundation Ireland (SFI)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Body condition scores (BCS) measure a cow's fat reserves and is important for management and research. Manual BCS assessment is subjective, time-consuming, and requires trained personnel. The BodyMat F (BMF, Ingenera SA, Cureglia, Switzerland) is an automated body condition scoring system using a 3D sensor to estimate BCS. This study assesses the BMF. One hundred and three Holstein Friesian cows were assessed by the BMF and two assessors throughout a lactation. The BMF output is in the 0-5 scale commonly used in France. We develop and report the first equation to convert these scores to the 1-5 scale used by the assessors in Ireland in this study ((0-5 scale x 0.38) + 1.67 -> 1-5 scale). Inter-assessor agreement as measured by Lin's concordance of correlation was 0.67. BMF agreement with the mean of the two assessors was the same as between assessors (0.67). However, agreement was lower for extreme values, particularly in over-conditioned cows where the BMF underestimated BCS relative to the mean of the two human observers. The BMF outperformed human assessors in terms of reproducibility and thus is likely to be especially useful in research contexts. This is the second independent validation of a commercially marketed body condition scoring system as far as the authors are aware. Comparing the results here with the published evaluation of the other system, we conclude that the BMF performed as well or better.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available