4.7 Article

Solution-Processed CuSbS2 Thin Films and Superstrate Solar Cells with CdS/In2S3 Buffer Layers

Journal

ACS APPLIED ENERGY MATERIALS
Volume 3, Issue 8, Pages 7885-7895

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acsaem.0c01296

Keywords

copper; antimony; chalcogenide; molecular precursor; semiconductor; sulfide

Funding

  1. Australian Research Council [DE150100427, DE170100164, CE170100026, DE130100635]
  2. Vice-Chancellor Research Fellowship scheme of RMIT University
  3. Office of the Chief Executive through the CSIRO Manufacturing Flagship
  4. Australian Research Council [DE150100427, DE130100635] Funding Source: Australian Research Council

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Herein, we describe a method to deposit thin films of the semiconductor CuSbS2 with micrometer-sized grains under inert atmosphere at mild processing temperatures. This is achieved through the decomposition of Cu and Sb dithiocarbamate precursors. Through careful optimization of the processing conditions, phase-pure p-type CuSbS2 thin films with high photoconductivity have been achieved. Tunability of the Cu/Sb ratios is also demonstrated while maintaining phase purity. Photoelectrochemistry is conducted as a function of both processing temperature and Cu/Sb ratio with 10% copper-deficient films annealed between 350 and 400 degrees C, producing the highest relative photocurrent. To assess the performance of these thin films, planar thin-film solar cells are fabricated. Superstrate solar cells (glass/FTO/CdS/(In2S3)/CuSbS2/SPIRO/Au) with either a CdS n- type window layer or a CdS/In2S3 dual n-type window/buffer layer are investigated. The use of a thin buffer layer further boosts the overall device performance, and a champion power conversion efficiency of 1.72% is demonstrated. To date, this efficiency is among the best reported for CuSbS2 solar cells and the highest for solution-processed devices using a planar thin-film architecture.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available