4.7 Article

Thermal conductance across harmonic-matched epitaxial Al-sapphire heterointerfaces

Journal

COMMUNICATIONS PHYSICS
Volume 3, Issue 1, Pages -

Publisher

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/s42005-020-0383-6

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Office of Naval Research MURI [N00014-18-1-2429]
  2. Office of Naval Research [N00014-18-1-2724]
  3. Extreme Science and Engineering Discovery Environment (XSEDE)
  4. National Science Foundation [ACI-1053575]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The mechanism of thermal transport at solid interfaces depends on many parameters in particular the quality of the interface. Here, the authors compare experimental and calculated thermal boundary conductance across high-quality harmonic-matched epitaxial Al-sapphire interfaces and find that elastic phonon processes dominate the ultra-clean interfaces. A unified fundamental understanding of interfacial thermal transport is missing due to the complicated nature of interfaces. Because of the difficulty to grow high-quality interfaces and lack of materials characterization, the experimentally measured thermal boundary conductance (TBC) in the literature are usually not the same as the ideally modelled interfaces. This work provides a systematic study of TBC across the highest-quality (atomically sharp, harmonic-matched, and ultraclean) epitaxial (111) Al||(0001) sapphire interfaces to date. The comparison of measured high TBC with theoretical models shows that elastic phonon transport dominates the interfacial thermal transport and other mechanisms play negligible roles. This is confirmed by a nearly constant transmission coefficient by scaling the TBC with the Al heat capacity and sapphire heat capacity with phonon frequency lower than 10 THz. Finally, the findings in this work will impact applications such as electronics thermal management, thermoelectric energy conversion, and battery safety.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available