4.7 Article

Proteome of Glioblastoma-Derived Exosomes as a Source of Biomarkers

Journal

BIOMEDICINES
Volume 8, Issue 7, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/biomedicines8070216

Keywords

glioblastoma; protein expression; proteomics; biomarkers; exosomes

Funding

  1. Russian Science Foundation [19-74-20146]
  2. Russian Foundation for Basic Research [18-015-00289]
  3. Ministry of Education and Science of the Russian Federation [RFMEFI62117 x 0017]
  4. RFBR
  5. BRFBR [20-54-00011]
  6. Russian Science Foundation [19-74-20146] Funding Source: Russian Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Extracellular vesicles (EV) are involved in important processes of glioblastoma multiforme (GBM), including malignancy and invasion. EV secreted by glioblastoma cells may cross the hematoencephalic barrier and carry molecular cargo derived from the tumor into the peripheral circulation. Therefore, the determination of the molecular composition of exosomes released by glioblastoma cells seems to be a promising approach for the development of non-invasive methods of the detection of the specific exosomal protein markers in the peripheral blood. The present study aimed to determine the common exosomal proteins presented in preparations from different cell lines and search potential glioblastoma biomarkers in exosomes. We have performed proteomics analysis of exosomes obtained from the conditioned culture medium of five glioblastoma cell lines. A list of 133 proteins common for all these samples was generated. Based on the data obtained, virtual two-dimensional electrophoresis (2DE) maps of proteins presented in exosomes of glioblastoma cells were constructed and the gene ontology (GO) analysis of exosome proteins was performed. A correlation between overexpressed in glial cell proteins and their presence in exosomes have been found. Thus, the existence of many potential glioblastoma biomarkers in exosomes was confirmed.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available