4.7 Article

Graphite-loaded cotton wool: A green route to highly-porous and solid graphite pellets for thermoelectric devices

Journal

COMPOSITES COMMUNICATIONS
Volume 20, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.coco.2020.04.011

Keywords

Thermoelectric; Porous graphite; Green method; Cotton wool fibres

Funding

  1. Welsh Government (EU European Regional Development Fund) [81435]
  2. EPSRC [EP/M028267/1]
  3. European Regional Development Fund through the Welsh Government [80708]
  4. Ser Solar project via Welsh Government
  5. EPSRC [EP/M028267/1] Funding Source: UKRI

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The high porosity of thermoelectric materials is a valuable feature to ideally reduce thermal conductivity without degrading electrical conductivity. This paper describes a unique low-temperature and direct method for making highly porous yet solid graphite pellets. Cotton wools were loaded with graphite particles, and pressed to yield low-density graphite pellets. The electrical and thermal properties of the resulting pellets have been studied. A significant reduction in the heat flow through the pellets has been observed as compared to a pure graphite pellet. For the porous pellets, the electrical conductivity was slightly lower than that of pure graphite pellets due to the charge scattering processes of the highly porous network, yet the thermal conductivity was drastically reduced with enhancements in Seebeck coefficients hence, a significant improvement in the thermoelectric property. Overall, the power factor was found to increase from 0.303 mu Wm(-1)K(-2) for solid graphite pellet to 0.424 mu Wm(-1)K(-2) for porous graphite pellet, showing a simultaneously improved power factor and reduced thermal conductance. The approach can be extended for other good thermoelectric materials to achieve further enhancements in their properties and useful to reduce material cost.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available