4.6 Article

Ecoacoustics in the rain: understanding acoustic indices under the most common geophonic source in tropical rainforests

Journal

REMOTE SENSING IN ECOLOGY AND CONSERVATION
Volume 6, Issue 3, Pages 248-261

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/rse2.162

Keywords

Ecological metrics; noise; pluviosity; power spectral density; rainfall automatic detection; soundscape ecology

Funding

  1. Grupo Herpetologico de Antioquia
  2. ISAGEN S.A. [46/4208, 47/574]
  3. Colombian Department of Science, Technology and Innovation (COLCIENCIAS)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Rainfall is one of the most predominant geophonic sources in nature, and the major climatic phenomenon influencing species biology in tropical ecosystems. Although its effects on acoustic indices have been studied, rainfall is recognized as a nuisance factor affecting their estimation. Consequently, files with rainfall sounds are typically removed from ecoacoustic analyses. In tropical rainforests, where rainfall is a common and unpredictable event, its influence on acoustic indices needs to be explicitly examined before implementing acoustic passive monitoring. Using mixed-effects models we assessed the effect of different rainfall conditions on the direction and magnitude of the values of eight commonly used acoustic indices. We obtained 18336 1-min recordings from 28 sampling sites in a montane forest on the northern Andes of Colombia between May-July 2018. We identified 2867 1-min recordings containing light to heavy rainfall. We found that both rainfall occurrence and its variation in intensity were associated with increases in ACI, ADI, H, and M index values, and decreases in AEI, BI, NDSI, and NP values. The estimated indices exhibited differential sensitivity to rainfall, with M, NDSI, and NP showing higher differences associated with increasing frequency and intensity of rainfall. Regardless the direction of change in index values caused by rainfall, we found that the magnitude of variation depended on the index. For instance, ACI and BI indices showed low sensitivity and can be considered as reliable acoustic metrics, even during heavy intensity rainfall. In contrast, M, NDSI, and NP might lead to misleading inferences, if rainfall events are not considered during calculation. We stress the importance of careful interpretation of biological inferences based on these sensitive indices and encourage an explicit assessment of rainfall, particularly in short-term acoustic surveys in highly pluvious regions where rainfall is a conspicuous component of the soundscape.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available