4.7 Article

Association of Formulary Prior Authorization Policies With Buprenorphine-Naloxone Prescriptions and Hospital and Emergency Department Use Among Medicare Beneficiaries

Journal

JAMA NETWORK OPEN
Volume 3, Issue 4, Pages -

Publisher

AMER MEDICAL ASSOC
DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.3132

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Arnold Ventures

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Question Is prior authorization associated with reduced use of buprenorphine-naloxone and increased emergency department visits and hospitalizations? Findings This comparative interrupted time series analysis of Medicare beneficiaries with opioid use disorders found that Medicare Part D plans that removed prior authorization had an associated increase in the use of buprenorphine-naloxone, whereas plans that added prior authorization had an associated decrease in buprenorphine-naloxone use. Higher rates of buprenorphine-naloxone use were associated with lower emergency department visits and hospitalizations. Meaning These findings suggest that policies to remove prior authorization on buprenorphine-naloxone may be associated with increased use of these medications and improved health care outcomes. Importance Prior authorization requirements may be a barrier to accessing medications for opioid use disorder treatment and may, therefore, be associated with poor health care outcomes. Objective To determine the association of prior authorization with use of buprenorphine-naloxone and health care outcomes. Design, Setting, and Participants This comparative interrupted time series analysis examined enrollment and insurance claims data from Medicare beneficiaries with an opioid use disorder diagnosis or who filled a prescription for an opioid use disorder medication between 2012 and 2017. Over this period, 775 & x202f;874 members were in 1479 Part D plans that always required prior authorization, 113 & x202f;286 members were in 206 plans that removed prior authorization, 189 & x202f;461 members were in 489 plans that never required prior authorization, and 619 & x202f;919 members were in 485 plans that added prior authorization. Data analysis was performed from April 2019 to February 2020. Exposures Removal or addition of prior authorization and new prescriptions filled for buprenorphine-naloxone. Main Outcomes and Measures Buprenorphine-naloxone use, inpatient admissions, emergency department visits, and prescription drug and medical expenditures. Results The study population in 2012 included 949 & x202f;206 Medicare beneficiaries (mean [SD] age, 57 [15] years; 550 & x202f;445 women [58%]). Removal of prior authorization was associated with an increase of 17.9 prescriptions (95% CI, 1.1 to 34.7 prescriptions) filled for buprenorphine-naloxone per plan per year, which is a doubling of the number of prescriptions, on average. Each prescription filled was associated with statistically significant decreases in adverse health care outcomes: substance use disorder-related inpatient admissions decreased by 0.1 admission per plan per year (95% CI, -0.2 to -0.1 admission per plan per year), and substance use disorder-related emergency department visits decreased by 0.1 visit per plan per year (95% CI, -0.13 to -0.03 visit per plan per year) (all P < .001). Combining these results, removal of prior authorization was associated with a reduction in substance use disorder-related inpatient admissions by 2.0 admissions per plan per year (95% CI, -4.3 to -0.1 admissions per plan per year) and substance use disorder-related emergency department visits by 1.4 visits per plan per year (95% CI, -3.2 to -0.1 visits per plan per year). Conclusions and Relevance Removing prior authorization for buprenorphine-naloxone was associated with an increase in the medication use and decreases in health care utilization and expenditures. This study uses a comparative interrupted time series analysis to examine the association of prior authorization with use of buprenorphine-naloxone and health care outcomes among Medicare beneficiaries.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available