4.5 Article

Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging Connectivity Accurately Distinguishes Cases With Psychotic Disorders From Healthy Controls, Based on Cortical Features Associated With Brain Network Development

Journal

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.bpsc.2020.05.013

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. European Commission (PSYSCAN-Translating Neuroimaging Findings From Research Into Clinical Practice) [603196]
  2. National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Cambridge Biomedical Research Centre (Mental Health)
  3. Center of Biomedical Research Excellence Grant from the National Institutes of Health [5P20RR021938/P20GM103472]
  4. Henslow Fellowship at Lucy Cavendish College, University of Cambridge - Cambridge Philosophical Society
  5. Alan Turing Institute Research Fellowship under EPSRC Research Grant [TU/A/000017]
  6. Dutch Research Council (NWO) Vidi
  7. ALW open grant
  8. MQ Mental Health fellowship
  9. European Research Council [677467]
  10. Science Foundation Ireland [12/IP/1359]
  11. NIHR Senior Investigator Award
  12. MRC [MC_G0802534] Funding Source: UKRI
  13. Science Foundation Ireland (SFI) [12/IP/1359] Funding Source: Science Foundation Ireland (SFI)
  14. European Research Council (ERC) [677467] Funding Source: European Research Council (ERC)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Machine learning algorithms can accurately distinguish cases with psychotic disorders from healthy controls based on functional MRI connectivity data, with a high accuracy rate. The diagnostic connectivity features in functional MRI mapping can replicate and predict differences between cases and controls, as well as predict probabilities of psychosis in siblings, highlighting abnormal network development in psychosis.
BACKGROUND: Machine learning (ML) can distinguish cases with psychotic disorder from healthy controls based on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) data, but it is not yet clear which MRI metrics are the most informative for case control ML, or how ML algorithms relate to the underlying biology. METHODS: We analyzed multimodal MRI data from 2 independent case-control studies of psychotic disorders (cases, n = 65, 28; controls, n = 59, 80) and compared ML accuracy across 5 selected MRI metrics from 3 modalities. Cortical thickness, mean diffusivity, and fractional anisotropy were estimated at each of 308 cortical regions, as well as functional and structural connectivity between each pair of regions. Functional connectivity data were also used to classify nonpsychotic siblings of cases (n = 64) and to distinguish cases from controls in a third independent study (cases, n = 67; controls, n = 81). RESULTS: In both principal studies, the most informative metric was functional MRI connectivity: The areas under the receiver operating characteristic curve were 88% and 76%, respectively. The cortical map of diagnostic connectivity features (ML weights) was replicable between studies (r = 0.27, p , .001); correlated with replicable case-control differences in functional MRI degree centrality and with a prior cortical map of adolescent development of functional connectivity; predicted intermediate probabilities of psychosis in siblings; and was replicated in the third case-control study. CONCLUSIONS: ML most accurately distinguished cases from controls by a replicable pattern of functional MRI connectivity features, highlighting abnormal hubness of cortical nodes in an anatomical pattern consistent with the concept of psychosis as a disorder of network development.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available