4.7 Article

Compositional Engineering of Chloride Ion-Doped CsPbBr3Halides for Highly Efficient and Stable All-Inorganic Perovskite Solar Cells

Journal

SOLAR RRL
Volume 4, Issue 10, Pages -

Publisher

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/solr.202000362

Keywords

Cl(-)ion doping; CsPbBr(3)perovskite solar cells; energy-level alignments; hole mobility; trap-state densities

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [61604143, 61774139, U1802257]
  2. Natural Science Foundation of Guangdong Province [2019B151502061]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Carbon-based CsPbBr3 perovskite solar cells (PSCs) without hole-transporting layers (HTLs) have aroused extensive attention due to their low manufacturing cost and prominent ambient stability. However, the defects of perovskite film and the poor charge extraction within PSCs result in severe charge recombination, which restricts the further enhancement of device efficiency. In view of this critical point, a compositional engineering of CsPbBr(3)perovskite via doping with Cl(-)ions is presented herein to decrease the trap states and enhance the charge extraction. It is revealed that the doping of Cl(-)ions not only enlarges the grain size and thereby reduces the trap-state density, but also optimizes the energy-level alignment and improves the hole mobility of the perovskite film, leading to an evidently suppressed charge recombination and improved charge extraction and transportation. As a result, a champion power conversion efficiency (PCE) of 9.73% is achieved for carbon-based HTL-free CsPbBr2.98Cl0.02 PSC, yielding a marked enhancement in comparison with 6.69% efficiency for the control. Meanwhile, the thermal and moisture stabilities of unencapsulated CsPbBr2.98 Cl-0.02 PSC are improved, maintaining 93% and 95% of the initial PCE after expose to air atmosphere with 80% relative humidity (RH) and at 80 degrees C over 60 days, respectively.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available