4.7 Article

Approaching the Most Economic Preparation of Hole Transport Layer by Organic Monomolecular Strategy for Efficient Inverted Perovskite Solar Cells

Journal

SOLAR RRL
Volume 4, Issue 6, Pages -

Publisher

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/solr.202000011

Keywords

energy-level alignment; hole transport layers; inverted perovskite solar cells; organic monomolecular layer; polyTPD

Funding

  1. Guangdong High-level Personnel of Special Support Program-Outstanding young scholar in science and technology innovation [2015TQ01C543]
  2. National Key Research and Development Project funding from the Ministry of Science and Technology of China [2016YFA0202400, 2016YFA0202404]
  3. Peacock Team Project funding from Shenzhen Science and Technology Innovation Committee [KQTD2015033110182370]
  4. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51776094]
  5. Guangdong Natural Science Funds for Distinguished Young Scholars [2015A030306044]
  6. Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Energy Materials for Electric Power [2018B030322001]
  7. Shenzhen Engineering R&D Center for Flexible Solar Cells Project funding from Shenzhen Development and Reform Committee [2019-126]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Hole transport materials and their processing occupy at least one-third of the cost of perovskite solar cells (PSCs), which leaves plenty of room to improve the process of device fabrication. Herein, a facile immersing and washing strategy (I-method) is reported to prepare effective organic monomolecular layers (MLs) of poly[N,N '-bis(4-butylphenyl)-N,N '-bis(phenyl) benzidine] (polyTPD) as hole transport layers (ML-HTLs) to construct cost-effective planar inverted PSCs. The ML enables an enhanced wettability to perovskite precursors and thus results in the growth of compact and uniform perovskite films. In addition, the ML exhibits better energy-level alignment with perovskite. Consequently, the ML-polyTPD-based PSCs deliver significantly enhanced power conversion efficiency (PCE) and reproducibility, as compared to that of pristine polyTPD based devices. The practical consumption of polyTPD during the I-method is cut to the bone, with the cost of $0.8 for 1 m(2) substrate being achieved, which is 0.15% of that by S-method. The developed I-method is facile, and time- and cost-saving with low requirement for facilities as well as with low temperature and solution processability. This strategy is cost-effective to prepare ML-HTLs for large-area and flexible PSCs with competitive photovoltaic performance and enhanced reproducibility.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available