4.8 Article

Biodegradation behavior of micro-arc oxidation coating on magnesium alloy-from a protein perspective

Journal

BIOACTIVE MATERIALS
Volume 5, Issue 2, Pages 398-409

Publisher

KEAI PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.bioactmat.2020.03.005

Keywords

Magnesium alloy; Protein; Degradation; Micro-arc oxidation; Biocompatibility

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51571134]
  2. SDUST Research Fund [2014TDJH104]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Protein exerts a critical influence on the degradation behavior of absorbable magnesium (Mg)-based implants. However, the interaction mechanism between protein and a micro-arc oxidation (MAO) coating on Mg alloys remains unclear. Hereby, a MAO coating was fabricated on AZ31 Mg alloy. And its degradation behavior in phosphate buffer saline (PBS) containing bovine serum albumin (BSA) was investigated and compared with that of the uncoated alloy. Surface morphologies and chemical compositions were studied using Field-emission scanning electron microscope (FE-SEM), Fourier transform infrared spectrophotometer (FT-IR) and X-ray diffraction (XRD). The degradation behavior of the bare Mg alloy and its MAO coating was studied through electrochemical and hydrogen evolution tests. Cytotoxicity assay was applied to evaluate the biocompatibility of Mg alloy substrate and MAO coating. Results indicated that the presence of BSA decreased the degradation rate of Mg alloy substrate because BSA (RCH(NH2)COO.) molecules combined with Mg2+ ions to form (RCH(NH2)COO)(2)Mg and thus inhibited the dissolution of Mg(OH)(2) by impeding the attack of Cl. ions. In the case of MAO coated Mg alloy, the adsorption of BSA on MAO coating and the formation of (RCH(NH2)COO)(2)Mg exhibited a synergistic effect and enhanced the corrosion resistance of the coated alloy significantly. Furthermore, cell bioactive assay suggested that the MAO coating had good viability for MG63 cells due to its high surface area.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available