4.7 Article

Species Distribution Models and Niche Partitioning among UnisexualDarevskia dahliand Its Parental Bisexual (D. portschinskii,D. mixta) Rock Lizards in the Caucasus

Journal

MATHEMATICS
Volume 8, Issue 8, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/math8081329

Keywords

Reptilia; Lacertidae; Squamata; reticulate evolution; caucasian rock lizards; parthenogenetic; ecological niches; spaces distribution models

Categories

Funding

  1. Russian Foundation for Basic Research [17-00-00427(17-00-00430 (K)]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Among vertebrates, true parthenogenesis is known only in reptiles. Parthenogenetic lizards of the genusDarevskiaemerged as a result of the hybridization of bisexual parental species. However, uncertainty remains about the mechanisms of the co-existence of these forms. The geographical parthenogenesis hypothesis suggests that unisexual forms can co-exist with their parental species in the marginal habitats. Our goal is to investigate the influence of environmental factors on the formation of ecological niches and the distribution of lizards. For this reason, we created models of species distribution and ecological niches to predict the potential geographical distribution of the parthenogenetic and its parental species. We also estimated the realized niches breadth, their overlap, similarities, and shifts in the entire space of predictor variables. We found that the centroids of the niches of the three studied lizards were located in the mountain forests. The maternal speciesD. mixtaprefers forest habitats located at high elevations, paternal speciesD. portschinskiicommonly occurs in arid and shrub habitats of the lower belt of mountain forests, andD. dahlioccupies substantially an intermediate or marginal position along environmental gradients relative to that of its parental species. Our results evidence that geographical parthenogenesis partially explains the co-existence of the lizards.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available