4.7 Article

Optimization of envelope design for housing in hot climates using a genetic algorithm (GA) computational approach

Journal

JOURNAL OF BUILDING ENGINEERING
Volume 32, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jobe.2020.101712

Keywords

Genetic algorithm; EnergyPlus; Life cycle cost; Envelope design; The 3Es analysis; Hot climates

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Little attention has been given to the use of optimization approach in the envelope design of thermally-massive structures in extreme hot climates. In addition, limited studies are reported to compare the optimal envelope design with those stipulated in standards and codes, considering the 3Es: energy, economic and environment. This study employs a computational approach for optimizing envelope design for housing in hot climates using a genetic algorithm (GA) technique, and a life cycle cost (LCC) analysis coupled with the EnergyPlus simulation program. A sensitivity analysis was performed using a verified housing model to determine the upper and lower limits of the optimization search domain. Several envelope design strategies were evaluated including walls and roof insulation, thermal mass, air tightness, window's areas, types of glazing, and window's shading. The optimization was then conducted for the subsidized and unsubsidized energy cost scenarios under three representative hot climates of Oman. The results indicated that window's shading is thermally and economically attractive across all climates. Depending on the energy cost scenario, 2.5 cm-5 cm more of thermal insulation is cost-optimal for envelope systems in hot climates when compared to warm-humid climate. The optimized cases were then compared to design cases following four prevalent regional thermal regulations; the Saudi code, the Estidama requirements, the Kuwaiti code, and the Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC) thermal regulations. Similar to the cost-optimal design, the GCC design case is proven to be economically attractive across all climates. With the exception of the warm-humid climate, other code-compliant design cases are economically feasible, provide more energy savings and have less impact on the environment for the hot climates. The government may provide rebates or incentives by redirecting the subsidy fund to promote these requirements.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available