4.6 Article

Preferential DNA Polymerase β Reverse Reaction with Imidodiphosphate

Journal

ACS OMEGA
Volume 5, Issue 25, Pages 15317-15324

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acsomega.0c01345

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Division of Intramural Research of the National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences
  2. National Institutes of Health [Z01ES043010, Z01-ES050159]
  3. NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH SCIENCES [ZIAES050158] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER

Ask authors/readers for more resources

DNA replication and repair reactions involve the addition of a deoxynucleoside monophosphate onto a growing DNA strand with the loss of pyrophosphate. This chemical reaction is also reversible; the addition of pyrophosphate generates a deoxynucleoside triphosphate, thereby shortening the DNA by one nucleotide. The forward DNA synthesis and reverse pyrophosphorolysis reactions strictly require the presence of divalent metals, usually magnesium, at the reactive center as cofactors. The overall equilibrium enzymatic reaction strongly favors DNA synthesis over pyrophosphorolysis with natural substrates. The DNA polymerase beta chemical reaction has been structurally and kinetically characterized, employing natural and chemically modified substrates. Substituting an imido-moiety (NH) for the bridging oxygen between P beta and P gamma of dGTP dramatically decreased the overall enzymatic activity and resulted in a chemical equilibrium that strongly favors the reverse reaction (i.e., K << 1). Using QM/MM calculations in conjunction with the utilization of parameters such as quantum mechanically derived atomic charges, we have examined the chemical foundation for the altered equilibrium with this central biological reaction. The calculations indicate that the rapid reverse reaction is likely due, in part, to the increased nucleophilicity of the reactive oxygen on the tautomeric form of imidodiphosphate.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available