4.7 Article

Characterisation of ultra-fine fly ash as sustainable cementitious material for masonry construction

Journal

AIN SHAMS ENGINEERING JOURNAL
Volume 12, Issue 1, Pages 259-269

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.asej.2020.07.008

Keywords

Waste management; Ultra-fine fly ash; Compressive strength; Masonry prism; Micro structural analysis

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study investigates the strength improvement and microstructural behavior of ultra-fine fly ash particles through synthesis and characterization techniques, showing positive effects on mortar and masonry. X-Ray Diffraction reveals multiphase crystalline structures, while readings indicate enhanced compressive strength, shear resistance, and bonding in construction applications using ultra-fine fly ash.
The study aims to understand the strength improvement and microstructural behavior of ultra-fine fly ash particles through synthesis and characterization techniques by analyzing the fly ash mortar and masonry prism. The process of grinding alters the particle size and specific surface area but not shown any variation in chemical composition are concluded from the microstructural analysis. The multiphase crystalline structures were found through the X-Ray Diffraction. From XRD, a pattern was incorporated to measure the micro-cracks size decrease and the strain was not obtained for a lattice. The reading shows the good amplification in the use of ultra-fine fly ash blended cement mortar associated with raw fly ash. The ultra-fine fly ash masonry block shows higher compressive strength, higher resistance to shear, higher bonding between two bricks compare to conventional masonry blocks. Overall, investigations show that additional use of 45% ultra-fine fly ash in construction applications without compromising the quality. ? 2020 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. on behalf of Faculty of Engineering, Ain Shams University.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available