4.6 Article

Population Structure of Non-ST6Listeria monocytogenesIsolated in the Red Meat and Poultry Value Chain in South Africa

Journal

MICROORGANISMS
Volume 8, Issue 8, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/microorganisms8081152

Keywords

L; monocytogenes; subtyping; serogroups; sequence types; clone complexes; pathogenic islands; lineages; inlA; sequencing

Categories

Funding

  1. Department of Agriculture, Land Reform and Rural Development (DALRRD) [21.1.1/VPH-01/OVI]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Meat products have been implicated in many listeriosis outbreaks globally, however there is a dearth of information on the diversity ofL. monocytogenesisolates circulating in food products in South Africa. The aim of this study was to investigate the population structure ofL. monocytogenesisolated in the meat value chain within the South African market. Based on whole-genome sequence analysis, a total of 217 isolates were classified into two main lineage groupings namely lineages I (n= 97; 44.7%) and II (n= 120; 55.3%). The lineage groups were further differentiated into IIa (n= 95, 43.8%), IVb (n= 69, 31.8%), IIb (n= 28, 12.9%), and IIc (n= 25, 11.5%) sero-groups. The most abundant sequence types (STs) were ST204 (n= 32, 14.7%), ST2 (n= 30, 13.8%), ST1 (n= 25, 11.5%), ST9 (n= 24, 11.1%), and ST321 (n= 21, 9.7%). In addition, 14 clonal complex (CCs) were identified with over-representation of CC1, CC3, and CC121 in Processed Meat-Beef, RTE-Poultry, and Raw-Lamb meat categories, respectively.Listeriapathogenic islands were present in 7.4% (LIPI-1), 21.7% (LIPI-3), and 1.8% (LIPI-4) of the isolates. Mutation leading to premature stop codons was detected ininlAvirulence genes across isolates identified as ST121 and ST321. The findings of this study demonstrated a high-level of genomic diversity amongL. monocytogenesisolates recovered across the meat value chain control points in South Africa.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available