4.6 Article

Diagnostic Potential of IgG and IgA Responses toMycobacterium tuberculosisAntigens for Discrimination among Active Tuberculosis, Latent Tuberculosis Infection, and Non-Infected Individuals

Journal

MICROORGANISMS
Volume 8, Issue 7, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/microorganisms8070979

Keywords

tuberculosis; serology; diagnosis; biomarkers

Categories

Funding

  1. National Medical Center, Republic of Korea [NMC2017-MS-05, NMC2020-MS-03, 03-2017-0040, 03-2018-0050]
  2. SNUH Research Fund

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Tuberculosis remains a major public health problem. Conventional tests are inadequate to distinguish between active tuberculosis (ATB) and latent tuberculosis infection (LTBI). We measured antibody responses toMycobacterium tuberculosisantigens (Mycobacterium tuberculosischorismate mutase (TBCM), antigen 85B (Ag85B), early secreted antigen-6 (ESAT-6), and culture filtrate protein-10 (CFP-10) in ATB, LTBI, and non-infected (NI) individuals. Serum immunoglobulin G (IgG) and immunoglobulin A (IgA) levels were measured and the QuantiFERON-TB Gold In-Tube assay was used to diagnose LTBI. IgG levels against TBCM were significantly higher in LTBI than NI subjects. IgG and IgA levels against Ag85B and IgG levels against CFP-10 were significantly higher in ATB, followed by LTBI, and then NI. When the ATB group was subdivided, IgG levels against Ag85B and CFP-10 were significantly higher in each subgroup compared with those in LTBI and NI groups. Positive correlation trends between interferon-gamma and IgG levels against Ag85B, TBCM, and CFP-10 and IgA levels against Ag85B in LTBI and NI subjects were observed. Age- and sex-adjusted models showed that IgG against TBCM and CFP-10 was independently related to LTBI diagnosis, and IgG against Ag85B was independently related to the diagnosis of ATB and could distinguish between LTBI and ATB. Overall, IgG antibody responses to TBCM, Ag85B, and CFP-10 can discriminate among ATB, LTBI, and NI groups.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available