4.6 Article

Geographical distribution of quinoa crop wild relatives in the Peruvian Andes: a participatory mapping initiative

Journal

ENVIRONMENT DEVELOPMENT AND SUSTAINABILITY
Volume 23, Issue 4, Pages 6337-6358

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10668-020-00875-y

Keywords

Chenopodium quinoaWilld; Crop wild relatives; Participatory mapping; In situ conservation; Peruvian Andes; Agroecosystem

Funding

  1. CONICYT PAI/INDUSTRIA [79090016]
  2. CIRAD
  3. ABIES Doctoral School
  4. Institut des Ameriques (IDA)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This article focuses on the presence and distribution of seven quinoa crop wild relatives (CWRs) in the Peruvian Andes, analyzing the social and environmental contexts in which they are found. Using a qualitative research method based on participatory mapping in the Puno region of Peru, the study confirms the presence of the species with local actors on participatory GIS maps. Conservation programs should consider both permanent native meadows and cultivated land with their fallow cycles and plot borders, as the diversity of the presence of quinoa CWRs is a result of the coexistence of these two land uses.
The Peruvian Andes are among the world's most important centers of origin for genetic diversity of crops and plants. Quinoa (Chenopodium quinoaWilld.) was domesticated in the Bolivian and Peruvian Andean region around Lake Titicaca. In situ conservation systems for quinoa germplasm and its wild relatives can still be found in the traditional systems of Peruvian farming communities. Quinoa crop wild relatives (CWRs), like the majority of CWRs of other agricultural species, are being affected by the considerable changes in the natural landscapes of the Andes. This article analyzes the presence and distribution of seven quinoa CWRs at the agroecosystem level and considers the social and environmental Andean contexts in which they are found. A qualitative research method based on participatory mapping in six local communities of the Puno region in Peru was applied to establish the presence and distribution of the species. We present the results that were confirmed with local actors on participatory GIS maps. Based on our analyses, we conclude that conservation programs should consider both permanent native meadows and cultivated land with their fallow cycles and plot borders. The diversity of the presence of quinoa CWRs is one result of the coexistence of these two land uses.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available