4.3 Article

Detection of the Oyashio and Kuroshio fronts under the projected climate change in the 21st century

Journal

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1186/s40645-020-00342-2

Keywords

Global warming; Climate projection; Kuroshio; Oyashio

Funding

  1. Social Implementation Program on Climate Change Adaptation Technology (SI-CAT) from the Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology (MEXT) [JPMXD0715667163]
  2. JSPS KAKENHI [18K14516]
  3. Nansen Center (NERSC)
  4. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [18K14516] Funding Source: KAKEN

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We evaluate the Oyashio and Kuroshio fronts latitudinal transition under the projected climate change scenarios using eddy resolving regional ocean climate projection products from 1981 to 2100. The regional ocean climate projections are produced based on dynamical downscaling of four CMIP5 models and two RCP experiments RCP2.6 and RCP8.5. Two approaches of the fronts detection methods are compared. One is conventional approach based on subsurface specific isotherm and another is newly proposed approach based on the Oyashio and Kuroshio water temperature and salinity (TS) profiles that may change as the global warming progresses. It is found that the Oyashio TS profile rapidly shift to be high both in temperature and salinity in RCP8.5 cases while the Kuroshio TS profile shows small change toward the end of the twenty-first century in all cases. Northward shift of the Oyashio and Kuroshio fronts reaches 2 degrees northward by the late twenty-first century in extreme case of RCP8.5 cases from the temperature-based definition. On the other hand, the northward shifts of fronts are less than 1 degrees when we use the TS-based definition. The comparison of both fronts positions with the surface velocity distributions suggest that the TS-based definition captures transitions of the fronts better than the temperature-based definition.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available