4.4 Editorial Material

The more favorable attitude of the citizens toward GMOs supports a new regulatory framework in the European Union

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS AS
DOI: 10.1080/21645698.2020.1795525

Keywords

Transgenic plants; genetically modified crops; confined field trial; environmental release; commercial cultivation; GM food; Eurobarometer; citizen attitude

Funding

  1. Ministry of Research and Innovation through Program 1 Development of the National R&D System, Subprogram 1.2 - Institutional Performance - Projects for Excellence Financing in RDI [22PFE/2018]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The global cultivation of GM crops has significantly increased from 1996 to 2018. The European Union has seen a decrease in the cultivation and field trials of GM crops, while the concern among EU citizens about GMOs in the environment and food has also decreased.
Since 1996 till 2018, the global area cultivated with GM crops has increased 113-fold, making biotech crops one of the fastest adopted crop technology in the past decades. In the European Union, only two countries still cultivate one available transgenic crop event on minor hectarage. Moreover, the number of notifications for confined field trials has dramatically dropped in the last decade. All these are happening while the EU legislation on GM crops has come under severe criticism. The percentage of EU citizens concerned about the presence of GMOs in the environment has decreased from 30% (in 2002) to 19% (in 2011), while the level of concern about the use of GM ingredients in food or drinks has decreased from 63% (in 2005) to 27% (in 2019). The steadily increasing acceptance of the EU citizens of GMOs in the environment and food, as it was recorded by Eurobarometers, should additionally ease the way and support a positive change of the legal framework that regulates the GM crops' testing and commercial cultivation in the EU.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available