4.6 Article

Newcastle Disease Virus (NDV) Oncolytic Activity in Human Glioma Tumors Is Dependent on CDKN2A-Type I IFN Gene Cluster Codeletion

Journal

CELLS
Volume 9, Issue 6, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/cells9061405

Keywords

glioblastoma; oncolytic virotherapy; Newcastle disease virus (NDV); Interferon I

Categories

Funding

  1. Fondo de Investigaciones Sanitarias (FIS) [PI17-01489]
  2. Miguel Servet Program del Instituto de Salud Carlos III [CP11/00147]
  3. Ministerio de Economia y Competitividad-FEDERER [RTC-2016-4990-1]
  4. NIH [R01CA229818]
  5. Ayudas destinadas a la realizacion de doctorados industriales CAM [IND2019/BMD17222]
  6. FPI fellowship by Universidad San Pablo CEU
  7. Consejeria de Educacion e Investigacion de la Comunidad de Madrid [NIETO-CM B2017/BMD-3731]
  8. Proyectos Fundacion CEU-San Pablo Banco Santander Grant [PPC16/2015]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Glioblastoma (GBM) is the most aggressive and frequent primary brain tumor in adults with a median overall survival of 15 months. Tumor recurrence and poor prognosis are related to cancer stem cells (CSCs), which drive resistance to therapies. A common characteristic in GBM isCDKN2Agene loss, located close to the cluster oftype I IFNgenes at Ch9p21. Newcastle disease virus (NDV) is an avian paramyxovirus with oncolytic and immunostimulatory properties that has been proposed for the treatment of GBM. We have analyzed theCDKN2A-IFN Igene cluster in 1018 glioma tumors and evaluated the NDV oncolytic effect in six GBM CSCs ex vivo and in a mouse model. Our results indicate that more than 50% of GBM patients have someIFNdeletion. Moreover, GBM susceptibility to NDV is dependent on the loss of thetype I IFN. Infection of GBM with an NDV-expressing influenza virus NS1 protein can overcome the resistance to oncolysis by NDV of type I-competent cells. These results highlight the potential of using NDV vectors in antitumor therapies.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available