4.6 Article

Low Prevalence of HER2-Positive Breast Carcinomas among Screening Detected Breast Cancers

Journal

CANCERS
Volume 12, Issue 6, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/cancers12061578

Keywords

breast cancer; screening; HER2; estrogen receptor; progesterone receptor; triple negative; luminal

Categories

Funding

  1. Instituto de Salud Carlos III (ISCIII) [PI 19/01331]
  2. CIBERONC [CB16/12/00316]
  3. European Development Regional Fund 'A way to achieve Europe' (FEDER)
  4. Spanish Association Against Cancer Scientific Foundation (ECC) (Grupos Coordinados Traslacionales ECC 2018)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Conflicting results have been reported regarding the prevalence of screen-detected human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-positive breast carcinomas and non-screen detected HER2-positive breast carcinomas. To address this issue, we evaluated the prevalence of HER2-positive breast carcinomas in two independent regional screening programs in Spain. The clinicopathologic and immunohistochemical characteristics of 479 (306 and 173) screen-detected breast carcinomas and 819 (479 and 340) non-screen-detected breast carcinomas diagnosed in women between 50 and 69-year-olds were compared. The prevalence of HER2-positive breast carcinomas was 8.8% and 6.4% in the two series of screen-detected tumors, compared with 16.4% and 13% in non-screen-detected carcinomas. These differences were statistically significant. This lower prevalence of HER2-positive in-screen-detected breast carcinomas was observed in both hormone receptor positive (luminal HER2) and hormone-receptor-negative (HER2 enriched) tumors. In addition, a lower prevalence of triple-negative and a higher prevalence of luminal-A breast carcinomas was observed in screen-detected tumors. Moreover, a literature review pointed out important differences in subrogate molecular types in screen-detected breast carcinomas among reported series, mainly due to study design, technical issues and racial differences.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available