4.6 Review

Resistance to Neoadjuvant Treatment in Breast Cancer: Clinicopathological and Molecular Predictors

Journal

CANCERS
Volume 12, Issue 8, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/cancers12082012

Keywords

breast cancer; neoadjuvant chemotherapy; pathological complete response; predictive markers; residual disease

Categories

Funding

  1. Instituto de Salud Carlos III [PI15/01823]
  2. European Commission MSCA Grant [799,818]
  3. Clinical Units of the Andalusian Health System [SA0263/2017]
  4. Institute of Biomedical Research in Malaga Instituto de investigacion Biomedica de Malaga (IBIMA)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy (NAC) in Breast Cancer (BC) has proved useful for the reduction in tumor burden prior to surgery, allowing for a more extensive breast preservation and the eradication of subjacent micrometastases. However, the impact on prognosis is highly dependent on the establishment of Pathological Complete Response (pCR), in particular for Triple Negative (TN) and Hormonal Receptor negative/Human Epidermal growth factor Receptor 2 positive (HR-/HER2+) subtypes. Several pCR predictors, such as PAM50, Integrative Cluster (IntClust), mutations in PI3KCA, or the Trastuzumab Risk model (TRAR), are useful molecular tools for estimating response to treatment and are prognostic. Major evolution events during BC NAC that feature the Residual Disease (RD) are the loss of HR and HER2, which are prognostic of bad outcome, and stemness and immune depletion-related gene expression aberrations. This dynamic nature of the determinants of response to BC NAC, together with the extensive heterogeneity of BC, raises the need to discern the individual and subtype-specific determinants of resistance. Moreover, refining the current approaches for a comprehensive monitoring of tumor evolution during treatment, RD, and eventual recurrences is essential for identifying new actionable alterations and the integral best management of the disease.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available