4.7 Review

Preeclampsia Is a Syndrome with a Cascade of Pathophysiologic Events

Journal

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MEDICINE
Volume 9, Issue 7, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/jcm9072245

Keywords

preeclampsia; gestational physiology; pathophysiology; inflammation; immune tolerance; extracellular vesicles; maternal hemodynamics; venous hemodynamics; venous congestion; intra-abdominal pressure

Funding

  1. Limburg Clinical Research Program (LCRP) - foundation Limburg Sterk Merk-Hasselt University-Ziekenhuis Oost Limburg-Jessa Hospital
  2. Hasselt University Research Fund
  3. Agency for Innovation by Science and Technology (IWT) Brussels [131581]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This review integrates the currently available information on the molecular, cellular, and systemic mechanisms involved in the pathophysiology of preeclampsia. It highlights that the growth, protection, and promotion of the conceptus requires the modulation of an intact maternal immune system, communication between the mother and fetus, and adaptation of the maternal organic functions. A malfunction in any of these factors, on either side, will result in a failure of the cascade of events required for the normal course of pregnancy. Maladaptive processes, initially aiming to protect the conceptus, fail to anticipate the gradually increasing cardiovascular volume load during the course of pregnancy. As a result, multiple organ dysfunctions install progressively and eventually reach a state where mother and/or fetus are at risk of severe morbidity or even mortality, and where the termination of pregnancy becomes the least harmful solution. The helicopter view on pathophysiologic processes associated with preeclampsia, as presented in this paper, illustrates that the etiology of preeclampsia cannot be reduced to one single mechanism, but is to be considered a cascade of consecutive events, fundamentally not unique to pregnancy.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available