4.8 Article

Incomplete annotation has a disproportionate impact on our understanding of Mendelian and complex neurogenetic disorders

Journal

SCIENCE ADVANCES
Volume 6, Issue 24, Pages -

Publisher

AMER ASSOC ADVANCEMENT SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1126/sciadv.aay8299

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Alzheimer's Research UK PhD fellowship
  2. Leonard Wolfson Doctoral Training Fellowship in Neurodegeneration
  3. UK Medical Research Council (MRC)
  4. Tenure Track Clinician Scientist Fellowship [MR/N008324/1]
  5. UK Dementia Research Institute
  6. Wellcome Trust [202903/Z/16/Z]
  7. Dolby Family Fund
  8. NIHR
  9. [MR/N026004/]
  10. [R21MH109956]
  11. MRC [MR/N026004/1, MR/N008324/1, MR/K01417X/1, G0901254, UKDRI-1009, G0701075] Funding Source: UKRI
  12. Wellcome Trust [202903/Z/16/Z] Funding Source: Wellcome Trust

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Growing evidence suggests that human gene annotation remains incomplete; however, it is unclear how this affects different tissues and our understanding of different disorders. Here, we detect previously unannotated transcription from Genotype-Tissue Expression RNA sequencing data across 41 human tissues. We connect this unannotated transcription to known genes, confirming that human gene annotation remains incomplete, even among well-studied genes including 63% of the Online Mendelian Inheritance in Man-morbid catalog and 317 neurodegeneration-associated genes. We find the greatest abundance of unannotated transcription in brain and genes highly expressed in brain are more likely to be reannotated. We explore examples of reannotated disease genes, such as SNCA, for which we experimentally validate a previously unidentified, brain-specific, potentially protein-coding exon. We release all tissue-specific transcriptomes through vizER: http://rytenlab.com/browser/app/vizER . We anticipate that this resource will facilitate more accurate genetic analysis, with the greatest impact on our understanding of Mendelian and complex neurogenetic disorders.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available