4.8 Article

PET, image-guided HDAC inhibition of pediatric diffuse midline glioma improves survival in murine models

Journal

SCIENCE ADVANCES
Volume 6, Issue 30, Pages -

Publisher

AMER ASSOC ADVANCEMENT SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1126/sciadv.abb4105

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Cristian Rivera Foundation
  2. Olivia Boccuzzi Foundation
  3. Fly a Kite Foundation
  4. McKenna Claire Foundation
  5. Lyonhearted Foundation
  6. Brooke Healey Foundation
  7. Isabella Rose Romano Foundation
  8. Lily LaRue Foundation
  9. Samuel Jeffers Childhood Cancer Foundation
  10. Ty Louis Campbell Foundation
  11. Children's Brain Tumor Family Foundation
  12. Alex Lemonade Stand Foundation (Innovation Grant)
  13. Department of Defense [CA160373]
  14. Christian Koehler Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Efforts at altering the dismal prognosis of pediatric midline gliomas focus on direct delivery strategies like convection-enhanced delivery (CED), where a cannula is implanted into tumor. Successful CED treatments require confirmation of tumor coverage, dosimetry, and longitudinal in vivo pharmacokinetic monitoring. These properties would be best determined clinically with image-guided dosimetry using theranostic agents. In this study, we combine CED with novel, molecular-grade positron emission tomography (PET) imaging and show how PETobinostat, a novel PET-imageable HDAC inhibitor, is effective against DIPG models. PET data reveal that CED has significant mouse-to-mouse variability; imaging is used to modulate CED infusions to maximize tumor saturation. The use of PET-guided CED results in survival prolongation in mouse models; imaging shows the need of CED to achieve high brain concentrations. This work demonstrates how personalized image-guided drug delivery may be useful in potentiating CED-based treatment algorithms and supports a foundation for clinical translation of PET obinostat.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available