Journal
SCIENCE ADVANCES
Volume 6, Issue 28, Pages -Publisher
AMER ASSOC ADVANCEMENT SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1126/sciadv.aba7232
Keywords
-
Categories
Funding
- NIH [R01-NS088353, R21-EY028647, R01-EY029408, R01-EY024376, P30-EY028102]
- UTHealth BRAIN Initiative/CTSA grant [TR000371]
- University of Texas System Neuroscience and Neurotechnology Research Institute [362469]
- Staman Ogilvie Fund-Memorial Hermann Foundation
- Herman Eye Fund (Ruiz Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Science)
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Mouse photoreceptors are electrically coupled via gap junctions, but the relative importance of rod/rod, cone/cone, or rod/cone coupling is unknown. Furthermore, while connexin36 (Cx36) is expressed by cones, the identity of the rod connexin has been controversial. We report that FACS-sorted rods and cones both express Cx36 but no other connexins. We created rod- and cone-specific Cx36 knockout mice to dissect the photoreceptor network. In the wild type, Cx36 plaques at rod/cone contacts accounted for more than 95% of photoreceptor labeling and paired recordings showed the transjunctional conductance between rods and cones was similar to 300 pS. When Cx36 was eliminated on one side of the gap junction, in either conditional knockout, Cx36 labeling and rod/cone coupling were almost abolished. We could not detect direct rod/rod coupling, and cone/cone coupling was minor. Rod/cone coupling is so prevalent that indirect rod/cone/rod coupling via the network may account for previous reports of rod coupling.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available