4.8 Article

High-throughput intracellular biopsy of microRNAs for dissecting the temporal dynamics of cellular heterogeneity

Journal

SCIENCE ADVANCES
Volume 6, Issue 24, Pages -

Publisher

AMER ASSOC ADVANCEMENT SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1126/sciadv.aba4971

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [81871452, 81802384, 51772318]
  2. Science, Technology and Innovation Committee of Shenzhen Municipality [JCYJ20170818100342392, JCYJ20180507181624871, JCYJ20170413141236903]
  3. General Research Fund from the Research Grants Council of Hong Kong SAR [11278616, 11203017, 11102317, 11103718, 11103619]
  4. Health and Medical Research Fund from the Food and Health Bureau of Hong Kong SAR [06172336]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The capability to analyze small RNAs responsible for post-transcriptional regulation of genes expression is essential for characterizing cellular phenotypes. Here, we describe an intracellular biopsy technique (inCell-Biopsy) for fast, multiplexed, and highly sensitive profiling of microRNAs (miRNAs). The technique uses an array of diamond nanoneedles that are functionalized with size-dependent RNA binding proteins, working as fishing rods to directly pull miRNAs out of cytoplasm while keeping the cells alive, thus enabling quasi-single-cell miRNA analysis. Each nanoneedle works as a reaction chamber for parallel in situ amplification, visualization, and quantification of miRNAs as low as femtomolar, which is sufficient to detect miRNAs of a single-copy intracellular abundance with specificity to single-nucleotide variation. Using inCell-Biopsy, we analyze the temporal miRNA transcriptome over the differentiation of embryonic stem cells (ESCs). The combinatorial miRNA expression patterns derived by inCell-Biopsy identify emerging cell subpopulations differentiated from ESCs and reveal the dynamic evolution of cellular heterogeneity.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available