4.8 Review

Materials design for bone-tissue engineering

Journal

NATURE REVIEWS MATERIALS
Volume 5, Issue 8, Pages 584-603

Publisher

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/s41578-020-0204-2

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. US National Institutes of Health [P41 EB023833, R01 AR068073, R01 CA180279]
  2. Robert and Janice McNair Foundation MD/PhD Student Scholar Program
  3. Rubicon postdoctoral fellowship from the Netherlands Organisation for Scientific Research [019.182EN.004]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Successful materials design for bone-tissue engineering requires an understanding of the composition and structure of native bone tissue, as well as appropriate selection of biomimetic natural or tunable synthetic materials (biomaterials), such as polymers, bioceramics, metals and composites. Scalable fabrication technologies that enable control over construct architecture at multiple length scales, including three-dimensional printing and electric-field-assisted techniques, can then be employed to process these biomaterials into suitable forms for bone-tissue engineering. In this Review, we provide an overview of materials-design considerations for bone-tissue-engineering applications in both disease modelling and treatment of injuries and disease in humans. We outline the materials-design pathway from implementation strategy through selection of materials and fabrication methods to evaluation. Finally, we discuss unmet needs and current challenges in the development of ideal materials for bone-tissue regeneration and highlight emerging strategies in the field. Design of bone-tissue-engineering materials involves consideration of multiple, often conflicting, requirements. This Review discusses these considerations and highlights scalable technologies that can fabricate natural and synthetic biomaterials (polymers, bioceramics, metals and composites) into forms suitable for bone-tissue-engineering applications in human therapies and disease models.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available