4.8 Review

Electrode material-ionic liquid coupling for electrochemical energy storage

Journal

NATURE REVIEWS MATERIALS
Volume 5, Issue 11, Pages 787-808

Publisher

NATURE PORTFOLIO
DOI: 10.1038/s41578-020-0218-9

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Fluid Interface Reactions, Structures and Transport (FIRST) Center, an Energy Frontier Research Center - US Department of Energy, Office of Science and Office of Basic Energy Sciences
  2. Samsung Electronics Co. (Samsung Advanced Institute of Technology, SAIT)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The development of efficient, high-energy and high-power electrochemical energy-storage devices requires a systems-level holistic approach, rather than focusing on the electrode or electrolyte separately. In this Review, we discuss the interfacial reactions and ion transport in ionic-liquid-based Li-ion batteries and supercapacitors, and summarize their impact on device performance. The development of new electrolyte and electrode designs and compositions has led to advances in electrochemical energy-storage (EES) devices over the past decade. However, focusing on either the electrode or electrolyte separately is insufficient for developing safer and more efficient EES devices in various working environments, as the energy-storage ability is determined by the ion arrangement and charge and/or electron transfer at the electrode-electrolyte interface. In this Review, we assess the fundamental physicochemical and electrochemical properties at the electrode-electrolyte interfaces in Li-ion batteries and supercapacitors using safe and electrochemically stable ionic-liquid electrolytes. Key reactions and interactions at the electrode-electrolyte interface, as well as geometric constraints and temperature effects, are highlighted. Building on the fundamental understanding of interfacial processes, we suggest potential strategies for designing stable and efficient ionic-liquid-based EES devices with emerging electrode materials.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available