4.5 Article

Evolutionary origins of the SARS-CoV-2 sarbecovirus lineage responsible for the COVID-19 pandemic

Journal

NATURE MICROBIOLOGY
Volume 5, Issue 11, Pages 1408-+

Publisher

NATURE PORTFOLIO
DOI: 10.1038/s41564-020-0771-4

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. European Research Council under the European Union's Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme [725422-ReservoirDOCS]
  2. MRC [MC_UU_1201412]
  3. Wellcome Trust [206298/Z/17/Z]
  4. Research Foundation-Flanders ('Fonds voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek-Vlaanderen') [G066215N, G0D5117N, G0B9317N]
  5. European Union's Horizon 2020 project MOOD [874850]
  6. National Natural Science Foundation of China Excellent Young Scientists Fund (Hong Kong and Macau) [31922087]
  7. South China Agricultural University [EPI_ISL_410721]
  8. Beijing Institute of Microbiology and Epidemiology [EPI_ISL_410538, EPI_ISL_410539, EPI_ISL_410540, EPI_ISL_410541, EPI_ISL_410542]
  9. MRC [MC_UU_12014/12] Funding Source: UKRI

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In this manuscript, the authors address evolutionary questions on the emergence of SARS-CoV-2. They find that SARS-CoV-2 is not a recombinant of any sarbecoviruses detected to date, and that the bat and pangolin sequences most closely related to SARS-CoV-2 probably diverged several decades ago or possibly earlier from human SARS-CoV-2 samples. There are outstanding evolutionary questions on the recent emergence of human coronavirus SARS-CoV-2 including the role of reservoir species, the role of recombination and its time of divergence from animal viruses. We find that the sarbecoviruses-the viral subgenus containing SARS-CoV and SARS-CoV-2-undergo frequent recombination and exhibit spatially structured genetic diversity on a regional scale in China. SARS-CoV-2 itself is not a recombinant of any sarbecoviruses detected to date, and its receptor-binding motif, important for specificity to human ACE2 receptors, appears to be an ancestral trait shared with bat viruses and not one acquired recently via recombination. To employ phylogenetic dating methods, recombinant regions of a 68-genome sarbecovirus alignment were removed with three independent methods. Bayesian evolutionary rate and divergence date estimates were shown to be consistent for these three approaches and for two different prior specifications of evolutionary rates based on HCoV-OC43 and MERS-CoV. Divergence dates between SARS-CoV-2 and the bat sarbecovirus reservoir were estimated as 1948 (95% highest posterior density (HPD): 1879-1999), 1969 (95% HPD: 1930-2000) and 1982 (95% HPD: 1948-2009), indicating that the lineage giving rise to SARS-CoV-2 has been circulating unnoticed in bats for decades.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available