4.6 Article

Hydrothermal deposition of antimony selenosulfide thin films enables solar cells with 10% efficiency

Journal

NATURE ENERGY
Volume 5, Issue 8, Pages 587-+

Publisher

NATURE PORTFOLIO
DOI: 10.1038/s41560-020-0652-3

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Key Research and Development Program of China [2019YFA0405600]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [61722402, 91833302, U1732150]
  3. Australian Renewable Energy Agency (ARENA)
  4. Australian Renewable Energy Agency [RND011]
  5. Shanghai Academic/Technology Research Leader [19XD1421300]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Antimony chalcogenides are emerging photovoltaic materials, yet difficulties in fabricating high-quality films limit device performance. We show that hydrothermal synthesis affords good morphology and reduced defects in antimony selenosulfide films, enabling solar cells with an efficiency of 10%. Antimony selenosulfide, Sb-2(S,Se)(3), has attracted attention over the last few years as a light-harvesting material for photovoltaic technology owing to its phase stability, earth abundancy and low toxicity. However, the lack of a suitable material processing approach to obtain Sb-2(S,Se)(3)films with optimal optoelectronic properties and morphology severely hampers prospects for efficiency improvement. Here we demonstrate a hydrothermal approach to deposit high-quality Sb-2(S,Se)(3)films. By varying the Se/S ratio and the temperature of the post-deposition annealing, we improve the film morphology, increase the grain size and reduce the number of defects. In particular, we find that increasing the Se/S ratio leads to a favourable orientation of the (Sb4S(e)(6))(n)ribbons (S(e) represents S or Se). By optmizing the hydrothermal deposition parameters and subsequent annealing, we report a Sb-2(S,Se)(3)cell with a certified 10.0% efficiency. This result highlights the potential of Sb-2(S,Se)(3)as an emerging photovoltaic material.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available