4.5 Article

Field-Based Estimate of the Sediment Deficit in Coastal Louisiana

Journal

Publisher

AMER GEOPHYSICAL UNION
DOI: 10.1029/2019JF005389

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. University of Arkansas (Fayetteville) Graduate School
  2. Department of Geoscience

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Coastal and deltaic sediment balances are crucial for a region's sustainability. However, such balances remain difficult to quantify accurately, particularly for large regions. We calculate organic and mineral sediment mass and volume balances using field measurements from 273 Coastwide Reference Monitoring System sites across the Louisiana Coast between 2006 and 2015. The rapid relative sea level rise rate (average 13.4 mm/year) is offset by the small dry bulk densities observed (average 0.3 g/cm(3)) to produce a 16.2 +/- 41.1% mass deficit and 24.1 +/- 14.0% volume deficit, significantly smaller than recent predictions for 2000-2100 (73-79% mass deficit). Geostatisical estimates show that this deficit is primarily located in areas not directly nourished by major rivers, yet these regions still accumulate similar to 24 MT/year of mineral sediment. A fluvial sediment discharge of 113.8 MT/year suggests a coast-wide trapping efficiency of 31.5 +/- 15.8% of the riverine sediment, excluding subaqueous deposition. Organic accumulation accounts for 25% of all mass accumulation during our study period, and total organic mass accumulation per unit area is relatively constant in both directly and indirectly nourished regions. Sediment characteristics in the modern coastal wetlands differ from the Holocene deposit, suggesting secular changes within the system that will likely continue to influence coastal dynamics over the coming decades. Our results suggest that the gap between accommodation and accumulation (mass or volume) during this decade was not as large as the previously predicted century average.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available