Journal
JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-ATMOSPHERES
Volume 125, Issue 15, Pages -Publisher
AMER GEOPHYSICAL UNION
DOI: 10.1029/2020JD032768
Keywords
biomass burning; satellite; air quality; Camp Fire; ensemble forecast; HYSPLIT
Categories
Funding
- NASA Health and Air Quality Program, NOAA Climate Program Office, Office of Weather and Air Quality, and Educational Partnership Program [NA16SEC4810006]
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Biomass burning releases a vast amount of aerosols into the atmosphere, often leading to severe air quality and health problems. Prediction of the air quality effects from biomass burning emissions is challenging due to uncertainties in fire emission, plume rise calculation, and other model inputs/processes. Ensemble forecasting is increasingly used to represent model uncertainties. In this paper, an ensemble forecast was conducted to predict surface PM2.5 during the 2018 California Camp Fire event using the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) HYSPLIT dispersion model at 0.1 degrees horizontal resolution. Different combinations of four satellite-based fire emission data sets (FEER, FLAMBE, GBBEPx, and GFAS), two plume rise schemes (Briggs and Sofiev), various meteorology inputs, and model setup options were used to create the forecast ensemble, for a total of 112 experiments. The performance of each ensemble member and the ensemble mean were evaluated using ground-based observations, with four statistical metrics and an overall rank. The ensemble spread of the 112 members reached 1,000 mu g/m(3), highlighting the large uncertainty in wildfire forecast. The ensemble mean displayed the best performance. Each fire emission product contributed to one or more members among the top 10 performers, revealing the forecasting dependence on both the quality of fire emissions data and model representation of emission, transport, and removal processes. In addition, an ensemble size reduction technique was introduced. With the help of this technique, the ensemble size was reduced from 112 to 28 members and still produced an ensemble mean that yielded comparable or even better performance to that of the full ensemble.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available