4.7 Article Data Paper

Building a PubMed knowledge graph

Journal

SCIENTIFIC DATA
Volume 7, Issue 1, Pages -

Publisher

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/s41597-020-0543-2

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Social Science Fund of China [18BTQ076]
  2. Chinese National Youth Foundation Research [61702564]
  3. Natural Science Foundation of Guangdong Province [2018A030313981]
  4. Soft Science Foundation of Guangdong Province [2019A101002020]
  5. National Research Foundation of Korea [NRF2019R1A2C2002577, NRF-2017R1A2A1A17069645]
  6. US National Institutes of Health [P01AG039347]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

PubMed(R)is an essential resource for the medical domain, but useful concepts are either difficult to extract or are ambiguous, which has significantly hindered knowledge discovery. To address this issue, we constructed a PubMed knowledge graph (PKG) by extracting bio-entities from 29 million PubMed abstracts, disambiguating author names, integrating funding data through the National Institutes of Health (NIH) ExPORTER, collecting affiliation history and educational background of authors from ORCID(R), and identifying fine-grained affiliation data from MapAffil. Through the integration of these credible multi-source data, we could create connections among the bio-entities, authors, articles, affiliations, and funding. Data validation revealed that the BioBERT deep learning method of bio-entity extraction significantly outperformed the state-of-the-art models based on the F1 score (by 0.51%), with the author name disambiguation (AND) achieving an F1 score of 98.09%. PKG can trigger broader innovations, not only enabling us to measure scholarly impact, knowledge usage, and knowledge transfer, but also assisting us in profiling authors and organizations based on their connections with bio-entities.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available