4.4 Review

Hydrides of the Alkali Metals and Alkaline Earth Metals Under Pressure

Journal

COMMENTS ON INORGANIC CHEMISTRY
Volume 37, Issue 2, Pages 78-98

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/02603594.2016.1196679

Keywords

alkaline earth hydrides; alkali hydrides; crystal structure prediction; density functional theory; electronic structure of solids; pressure; polyhydrides; superconductivity

Funding

  1. National Science Foundation [DMR-1505817]
  2. Alfred P. Sloan Foundation
  3. Division Of Materials Research
  4. Direct For Mathematical & Physical Scien [1505817] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

First-principles calculations coupled with evolutionary algorithms have been employed to predict the structures of hydrides of the alkali metals and alkaline earth metals under pressure. A plethora of novel phases with MHn; n > 1 and M=Li, Na, K, Rb, Cs, and MHn; n > 2 and M=Mg, Ca, Sr, Ba have been predicted to be stable at pressures that can be achieved in a diamond anvil cell. A number of structural motifs, including H-2(delta-), H- H-3(-),one-dimensional hydrogenic chains or three-dimensional sodalite-like lattices of hydrogen atoms, are found in the stable phases. The electronic structure and mechanism of metalization under pressure turn out to depend on the hydrogenic motifs that are present. Phases with 1D or 3D hydrogenic lattices are predicted to be the best candidates for high-temperature superconductivity, with those containing H-2(delta-) molecules following suit. Structures with H- or H-3(-) are not predicted to be good superconductors. Chemical trends regarding the pressure required for stabilization of the polyhydrides are discussed. Experimental studies that have successfully synthesized the polyhydrides of lithium and sodium are described. Lithium subhydrides, LimH with m > 1, are also predicted to be stable between 50-100 GPa.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available